MA Contact Your Legislators: PAROLE REFORM NOW

FROM THE COALITION FOR EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SAFETY
gojfc
Picture courtesy of Wrongful Conviction Blog
 

As the April 5th Globe editorial illustrated, the parole system is in dire need of reform. Please act now by asking your legislators to cosponsor two important pieces of legislation that would bring much needed change to Massachusetts:

Please see (and circulate!) this ACTION ALERT, which has quick summary information of the bills and an easy ready made email that you can send to your legislators when you enter your information (it will also give you a chance to modify it if you would like to).
 
If you prefer to copy and paste, see below:
PLEASE SUPPORT PAROLE REFORM!

The parole system in Massachusetts is broken, and in dire need of reform. Please act now by asking your legislators to cosponsor two important pieces of legislation that would bring much needed change to Massachusetts:

  • An Act to promote equitable access to parole fact sheet here (SD 1065/HD 2124, sponsored by Senator Creem, Representatives Vargas and Miranda) will improve the efficiency and balance of the parole board, account for the rights and needs of persons with certain disabilities, improve transparency, and reduce the amount of time prisoners must wait between parole reviews. It will require prisoners to be granted parole at their parole eligibility date unless the parole board determines that the prisoner would violate the law if released under appropriate conditions and community supervision. 

  • An Act to Reform Parole Supervision in the Interest of Justice (SD 2212/HD 3620, sponsored by Sen. Jehlen and Rep. Miranda) imposes specific requirements the parole board must follow when issuing conditions of parole to ensure that such conditions will be reasonably related to the crime of conviction of the person placed on parole and no more restrictive than necessary. It also ensures that a person’s parole cannot be revoked if they violate a condition of parole that does not result in a criminal conviction and establishes a process by which people serving lifetime parole sentences may petition the board after three years without violating the law for a hearing to terminate their parole. 

Sample email/script:
Dear Legislator,I am writing to ask that you cosponsor An Act to promote equitable access to parole (SD 1065/HD 2124, fact sheet here, sponsored by Senator Creem, Representatives Vargas and Miranda) and An Act to Reform Parole Supervision in the Interest of Justice (SD 2212/HD 3620, sponsored by Sen. Jehlen and Rep. Miranda).  As this recent Globe editorial illustrates, the current parole system is in dire need of reform.

These bills support reasonable parole reform that will be in the interest of public safety. Right now, the parole system is so broken that it keeps a lot of people incarcerated who could otherwise live free without violating the law. This has serious negative effects on community safety and racial justice, given the existing extreme racial disparities in incarceration in the Commonwealth. Incarcerating people who could live safely in the community concentrates the Commonwealth’s resources on imprisonment and punishment at the expense of healthy community support, even though we know that imprisonment does not address the underlying causes of violence and harm. Creating a more effective parole system would enable the Commonwealth to direct resources to systems of care such as education, health care and job creation, as well as help develop a social safety net to prevent harm.

A well functioning parole system would work to support people upon release, rather than work as a new form of punishment and surveillance. Unfortunately, right now, the parole system often sets people up to fail by imposing draconian conditions and re-incarcerating people for technical (non-criminal) violations, particularly people who may violate because they have had substance use disorder relapses, or because our systems have failed to provide the appropriate support. There are provisions in these bills which ensure that people are not immediately re-incarcerated for technical violations, and that parole must take steps to support people prior to re-incarceration.

Public safety is not served by having a system that is widely understood to be stacked against people who are up for parole. This leads to a lack of hope, and hope is crucial to create conditions for transformation and rehabilitation.

Thank you for your consideration and support.
Sincerely,

[Your name and contact information]

FOR MORE INFO ON OUR BROKEN PAROLE SYSTEM, READ MY ARTICLES at DIGBoston such as: https://digboston.com/the-dysfunctional-mass-parole-boards-inevitable-coronavirus-crisis

COMMONWEALTH COMMITTED TO “OTHER DEATH PENALTY”

Please see my newest article at DIGBoston: Commonwealth Committed to “Other Death Penalty”–New report shows 1/6 of women in Mass prisons sentenced to life without parole.Angela Jefferson (left) and her daughter, Shanita. Photo courtesy of Families for Justice as Healing WEBSITE

It begins: “The fear of the unknown is what I feel every day,” Angela Jefferson writes. The note came in an email from MCI Framingham, where she has served “30 long years.”

Jefferson adds, “I get sad a lot of times when I think about all of the things that I could be doing out there in the world to give back. I look out the window to my room and see the cars passing by, but the thing that makes it depressing is the barbed wire that is wrapped around the fences.”

Jefferson is one of the 26 women out of 163 currently held at the oldest women’s prison in the country who are serving life without parole (LWOP). Parole does not mean a guarantee of release but offers a second chance, whereas LWOP is often called “the other death penalty.” (I previously wrote about this in 2019.)  MORE

WHY ARE HALF OF MASS CORRECTION OFFICERS REFUSING THE COVID VACCINE?

See my newest article at DIGBoston which begins 

“The DOC has failed to control the virus.”

Prisoners’ Legal Services attorney Bonnie Tenneriello made that argument on Feb. 9, in the continuing PLS Superior Court case against the Department of Correction and the Mass Parole Board. An emergency motion was filed in October ordering the DOC to establish a home confinement program for sentenced prisoners, but there has been no significant decarceration since March, claims PLS, and they are still litigating the case.

Tenneriello lambasted the DOC in her opening for their multiple failures: they have not created a home confinement program; they have failed to reasonably release people who are sick and dying; and they are not following a new decarceration law approved by the legislature in December. As she built to her claim that both the DOC and the Parole Board are guilty of deliberate indifference, Tenneriello charged that since March, ‘Twenty-one people have died and over 2,800 people have been sickened by COVID.’

Another failure also was spotlighted in this hearing before Judge Robert Ullmann, who is trying the case: per Tenneriello, while COVID has been “raging,” 53% of DOC staff and correctional officers (COs) have “refused the vaccine.”  MORE

The DOC Mail Hearing, OMG

Photo from the Zoom hearing where many flashed an Icon instead of their name: “No New Mail Rules” #handsoffourmail. Photo Courtesy of Jean Trounstine

Please see my newest on DIGBoston called: DOC CAN BARELY RUN ZOOM MEETING, BUT WANTS TO SCAN ALL PRISONER MAIL 

It begins: “More than 100 people would have attended the three-and-a-half hour virtual hearing on proposed new mail rules last Friday if they’d been allowed in the Zoom room.

But because the Massachusetts Department of Correction did not purchase a Zoom webinar license to enable enough space for a public hearing of that size, dozens of people were turned away.”  MORE